Comments on: World In Conflict Trailer 2 http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2 Family Business Conflict Resolution To Create A Successful Business Future Thu, 11 Aug 2011 05:24:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Flem1234 http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2/comment-page-1#comment-847 Flem1234 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:33:22 +0000 http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2#comment-847 <b>well no one will win</b> <br> well no one will win well no one will win
well no one will win

]]> By: criminalzerg http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2/comment-page-1#comment-844 criminalzerg Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:33:21 +0000 http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2#comment-844 <b>Borscht hit the ...</b> <br> Borscht hit the nail right on the head. If russia had landed in the US, it would be a nightmare. As rouge up there said, there's no way in the US would win in a week with bombers. Look at Iraq for example, Americans have been in there for years now and they still havent won. Russia is the largest country on earth, lol. Iraq, is dot compared to russia. Borscht hit the …
Borscht hit the nail right on the head. If russia had landed in the US, it would be a nightmare.

As rouge up there said, there’s no way in the US would win in a week with bombers. Look at Iraq for example, Americans have been in there for years now and they still havent won. Russia is the largest country on earth, lol. Iraq, is dot compared to russia.

]]> By: Magni56 http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2/comment-page-1#comment-845 Magni56 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:33:21 +0000 http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2#comment-845 <b>Well, they have it ...</b> <br> Well, they have it quite good story-wise. Using small nukes to blast key bases while landing troops. USA can´t use ICBM´s against russia (no one wants to blow up the planet after all) and they can´t use nukes agains the russian ground troops cause they would cause collaterral damage to US civilians. Well, they have it …
Well, they have it quite good story-wise. Using small nukes to blast key bases while landing troops. USA can´t use ICBM´s against russia (no one wants to blow up the planet after all) and they can´t use nukes agains the russian ground troops cause they would cause collaterral damage to US civilians.

]]> By: Magni56 http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2/comment-page-1#comment-846 Magni56 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:33:21 +0000 http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2#comment-846 <b>Boy, that wwere ...</b> <br> Boy, that wwere different times. the Red Army back then was quite unlike waht you see today. Acording to the other trailers, storywise they use several cargo ships and tankers to secretly transport the troops over, use small yield nukes to destroy key bases and quickly seize harbors, naval bases and airfiels on the coast. quite a strategical nightmare for the US Armed Forces. Boy, that wwere …
Boy, that wwere different times. the Red Army back then was quite unlike waht you see today. Acording to the other trailers, storywise they use several cargo ships and tankers to secretly transport the troops over, use small yield nukes to destroy key bases and quickly seize harbors, naval bases and airfiels on the coast. quite a strategical nightmare for the US Armed Forces.

]]> By: criminalzerg http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2/comment-page-1#comment-842 criminalzerg Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:33:20 +0000 http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2#comment-842 <b>What I'm saying is, ...</b> <br> What I'm saying is, that a simple bombing of russia wouldent win the war. They would just bomb the US back. They have much better wepons than Iraq. With russia it could escelate to a nuclear winter, the way bush runs things What I’m saying is, …
What I’m saying is, that a simple bombing of russia wouldent win the war. They would just bomb the US back. They have much better wepons than Iraq. With russia it could escelate to a nuclear winter, the way bush runs things

]]> By: blizrun http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2/comment-page-1#comment-843 blizrun Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:33:20 +0000 http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2#comment-843 <b>It's a completely ...</b> <br> It's a completely different situation in Irag. In Iraq, we're fighting a guerrilla war. World in Conflict is depicting a (mostly) conventional war. There's a _huge_ difference between the two. It’s a completely …
It’s a completely different situation in Irag. In Iraq, we’re fighting a guerrilla war. World in Conflict is depicting a (mostly) conventional war. There’s a _huge_ difference between the two.

]]> By: goji04 http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2/comment-page-1#comment-839 goji04 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:33:19 +0000 http://www.familybusinessconflict.com/conflict-strategies/world-in-conflict-trailer-2#comment-839 <b>hello, do u think ...</b> <br> hello, do u think that citizens wouldn't take up arms, i mean u go to the mid-west, every household has at least 5 or 6 weapons hello, do u think …
hello, do u think that citizens wouldn’t take up arms, i mean u go to the mid-west, every household has at least 5 or 6 weapons

]]>