Nothing is neutral. Every decision we make and every action we take moves us closer to success or failure.

World In Conflict Trailer 2


Another clip from WIC

VG-Reloaded.com

Duration : 0:2:13


Recommended Reading

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share





25 Responses to “World In Conflict Trailer 2”

  1. doggeb114 says:

    This is a nice …
    This is a nice movie but only a idiot would total an nice airfield like this as it is a strategik place.

  2. doggeb114 says:

    Yes there is for …
    Yes there is for example NATO-units in this game and also units from other nations

  3. TomClancey902 says:

    God people calm …
    God people calm down, IT”S A GAME.
    Besides Bluebuy, you do find your comment ironic, we are the only nation that has ever lauched a nuclear/atomic strike at another nation.

  4. blueboy921 says:

    cowards throw a …
    cowards throw a nuke…tss

  5. Prezydent001 says:

    Better death than …
    Better death than the communism!
    Более xорошая смерть чем коммунизм! Der bessere Tod als der Kommunismus!
    Lepsza śmierć niż komunizm!

  6. NapalmEffect says:

    yes yes yes. USA …
    yes yes yes. USA USA USA. GO GET EM SOVIET RATS!

  7. 2142GenReaper says:

    LIFE SIZE NUKES
    LIFE SIZE NUKES

  8. mentalpatient423 says:

    It should be noted …
    It should be noted that if things ever even hinted at looking grim, we would scorch the earth and everyone knows that. The whole ‘Red Dawn’ fantasy is exactly what it is a fantasy.

  9. Helonion says:

    Wouldn’t the U.N. …
    Wouldn’t the U.N. send troops? Also other countries themselves.

  10. splcst659 says:

    SIMPLE RUSSIANS …
    SIMPLE RUSSIANS WOULD WE WAR!

  11. Blade666324 says:

    guys If russia did …
    guys If russia did invade it would be like the movie red dawn people would rebel and resort to guerrilla tactics I know I would.

  12. criminalzerg says:

    =P
    =P

  13. zebingo says:

    Lol Bombs and you …
    Lol Bombs and you could beat em to death with kitchen utensils :D
    And rofl on the care package joke

  14. criminalzerg says:

    True enough, fire …
    True enough, fire nukes at russia, you get the care package back.

    Goji is partly right though, people would take up arms, I know I would. I have no wepons but I do know how to make some pretty deadly bombs.

  15. zebingo says:

    Also if The us …
    Also if The us Fired nukes at Russia when there halfway across the ocean wouldnt russia Being at a time of readiness of such thing fire just as many Nukes back?

  16. sam5210 says:

    i live in the …
    i live in the midwest and i dont got a weapon nor do any of my friends

  17. goji04 says:

    hello, do u think …
    hello, do u think that citizens wouldn’t take up arms, i mean u go to the mid-west, every household has at least 5 or 6 weapons

  18. criminalzerg says:

    Well, that’s the …
    Well, that’s the only global damage, but in the US, if nukes went off accross the country there would be a lot more damage than a simple temporary climate change.

    Besides, again, all I’m trying to say is “a simple bombing of russia wouldent win the war”

  19. blizrun says:

    Well, of course …
    Well, of course that there would be a retaliation bombing; the Soviets were far better equipped than Saddam ever could’ve been.

    Nuclear winter, however, is a sham. The scientist who “discovered” it was already well established as anti-nuclear. A group went back later and discovered that the worse case scenario would be a drop in twenty degrees (global or local, I can’t remember) for a few weeks before temperatures returned to normal.

  20. criminalzerg says:

    What I’m saying is, …
    What I’m saying is, that a simple bombing of russia wouldent win the war. They would just bomb the US back. They have much better wepons than Iraq. With russia it could escelate to a nuclear winter, the way bush runs things

  21. blizrun says:

    It’s a completely …
    It’s a completely different situation in Irag. In Iraq, we’re fighting a guerrilla war. World in Conflict is depicting a (mostly) conventional war. There’s a _huge_ difference between the two.

  22. criminalzerg says:

    Borscht hit the …
    Borscht hit the nail right on the head. If russia had landed in the US, it would be a nightmare.

    As rouge up there said, there’s no way in the US would win in a week with bombers. Look at Iraq for example, Americans have been in there for years now and they still havent won. Russia is the largest country on earth, lol. Iraq, is dot compared to russia.

  23. Magni56 says:

    Well, they have it …
    Well, they have it quite good story-wise. Using small nukes to blast key bases while landing troops. USA can´t use ICBM´s against russia (no one wants to blow up the planet after all) and they can´t use nukes agains the russian ground troops cause they would cause collaterral damage to US civilians.

  24. Magni56 says:

    Boy, that wwere …
    Boy, that wwere different times. the Red Army back then was quite unlike waht you see today. Acording to the other trailers, storywise they use several cargo ships and tankers to secretly transport the troops over, use small yield nukes to destroy key bases and quickly seize harbors, naval bases and airfiels on the coast. quite a strategical nightmare for the US Armed Forces.

  25. Flem1234 says:

    well no one will win
    well no one will win

Leave a Reply