World in Conflict:
World in Conflict presents a chillingly authentic Cold War scenario where the Berlin Wall never fell. Created by Cold War authority and best-selling author Larry Bond, the story begins in 1989 as the Soviets, fearing certain collapse, boldly advance into Europe. NATO responds in force only to be met on a second front — a full-fledged invasion of the American homeland.
Players take on the role of field commander, leading the era’s most powerful military machines in the campaign to retake America’s cities and suburbs. The RTS gameplay features completely destructible 3D battlefields, aggressive team-based multiplayer action and a focus on fast, hard-hitting battles.
ESRB Rating: T for Blood, Language, Violence
Genre: Real-Time Strategy
Online Play: 16 Versus
Also Available On: Xbox 360, PlayStation 3
Release Date: September 18, 2007
MSRP: $49.99
September 21, 2007
September 30, 2007
Expansion Packs:
World in Conflict: Soviet Assault
_________________________
World in Conflict: Soviet Assault:
An expansion pack to the critically-acclaimed strategy game World in Conflict, Soviet Assault takes the battle to Russia with all-new campaigns set on USSR soil.
ESRB Rating: T for Blood, Language, Violence
Genre: Real-Time Strategy
Exclusively on PC
Release Date: March 1, 2009
October 1, 2008
March 31, 2009
Expansion To: World in Conflict
Duration : 0:1:12
Bill you’ve gota …
Bill you’ve gota come see this… Rofl
too bad for bill’s …
too bad for bill’s friend (and all those soldiers) the Russians went overkill with that Fuel Air Bomb.
PS: can anyone please tell me how to solve WiC render error, it shows all roads as red lines on the map, ANNOYING!
Excellent videoclip …
Excellent videoclip, the best game! This game possesses not only an excellent drawing and fascinating game process, but also a plot, in general idea of game is very interesting and even is useful to many people living in America…
poor bill
poor bill
That’s one spicy …
That’s one spicy meatball!
Now thats a big …
Now thats a big bang.
FUEL AIR BOMB FTW
FUEL AIR BOMB FTW
Not in 1941. By …
Not in 1941. By 1943 it was all over. Germany had no way of winning.
lol. US-Radars saw …
lol. US-Radars saw the Planes minutes before the assault. It was enough time to deploy interceptors and FLAK.
Ask one survivor of Pearl – they all will say, that Pearl was a very suspicious situation.
They was losing. They allowed a later Invasion, the D-Day, because Hitler was stupid enough to destroy civilian targets, rather than destroy the RAF.
Otherwise Germany could even launch an invasion of England.
Well that and we …
Well that and we were attacked by japan, then had war declared on us by Germany on Dec. 11, 1941. Germany was in no way losing the war in 1941.
But the U.S. has …
But the U.S. has already delivered weapons and vehicles to the Allies – and not just few.
Without the Deliveries the numbers would be:
20% USA – 40% Russia – 40% Allies
For what the U.S. has already done?
Atom bomb,
Bonbardierung on Germany,
yes the D-Day, but that was not a skill but pure battle of material – shown by the heavy losses
Without the big U.S. industry would be the United States only a fart…
So the British, …
So the British, French and other allies who were fighting for 2 years before the americans got there sorry arses and decided to come help contributed that little did they.
80% was at the …
80% was at the beginning of war.
After the Downfall of the Atlantikwall was it not more 80%!!!
You can not compare statistics, in 1942 was still up to date – 1944 it is no longer
^^
LIES LIES LIES, …
LIES LIES LIES, those statistics you just pulled out of your ass,
It’s common knowledge that 80% of the german casualties were on the east front
I tired to put a link to it earlier but youtube won’t let me to prevent spam, so just search for it there are several articles saying that it was 80% not 50
In WWII Europe – …
In WWII Europe – even with U.S. support – would have no chance. Would not many tactical mistakes of the Germans has been made.
For example, the armor technology in Russia. When the Russian tanks easily destroyed the much stronger German tanks, especially, this was the fault of the Germans to thank. The mistake here: The tanks were not on a strong winter converted.
The Russians …
The Russians preferred the downfall, not the war.
The U.S. is trying to spread the opinion that the Russians were the bad guys. – lol, ridiculous. -
Than @AHighPwner:
Yes they asked, but much earlier and at that time, the U.S. has rejected.
Only later, when the balance of power were clear, the U.S. joined the war.
In the 2nd World War the same again:
Remain neutral until the balance of power is clear.
actually we ( …
actually we ( britain, france) were winning in WW1 without your help, and only about a year before the end of the war, just as Germany was breaking up and revolting against the kaiser, were you guys joining in the war against them. You waited throughout the war and then picked the winning side
ok, ok I take back …
ok, ok I take back the nazi thing, but not just iraq that the US have done mass murder, Guatemala, Nicuragua, El, Salvador, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, installed the Taliban, Pinochet and Saddam, I could go on for ever with this, so yes you are right the US goverment is constantly starting wars and supporting mass murder and tyrants and dictators all over the world
suck it man, you …
suck it man, you dont know anything about your country, please do me a favor and google this word, zeitgeist, go watch both documentaries it will inform you a lot about many things so everybody google that word.ok bye bye
umm thats bullshit …
umm thats bullshit becuase its he world that asks for our help and freaks out weather we give it to them or not… WW1 without us, Eruope would fall to Germany, same with WWII. and we still get from people telling us how wrong we did everything. but guess what? we tried to stay out of both wars cause we diddnt want to be apart of it, but the world bitchhed and moaned and here we are. we earned everything we have becuase we worked for it. were not war hungry
Whoa, I would not …
Whoa, I would not call the US Nazi, but we definitly have problems with our country. I am an American and I dont like the direction the US is going. I can see why people from other countries would have a negative opinion about the US. The war in Iraq was not handled right. I really do not even know why our troops are over there.
whatever, war isnt …
whatever, war isnt necessary, but U.S. need war, cause without it they wouldnt be what they are now
u mean like a fuel …
u mean like a fuel air bomb.
So… We gotta have …
So… We gotta have war just to drive industry and technology? God bless you…
what?
what?